Thousands of people were detained in quarantine centres for alleged violations of a mandatory quarantine imposed in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. There were reports of precarious and insanitary conditions in these centres, as well as arbitrary detentions and excessive use of force. The President made public statements stigmatizing journalists and human rights organizations. The rights of the victims of crimes under international law and of human rights violations during the internal armed conflict remained under threat. Restrictions and attacks on freedom of the press and limited access to official information were reported throughout the year. The total ban on abortion remained in place.
In February, the Council of Ministers held an extraordinary session of the Legislative Assembly accompanied by a security forces deployment with reports of snipers stationed in the vicinity and restrictions on press freedom.1
In April, the President publicly rejected rulings of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court.2 In August, an investigation by the media revealed that President Bukele’s administration might have negotiated with a local gang to reduce crime rates.
No detailed information was made public about the content of the Territorial Control Plan, which sets out the country’s national security policy. Local organizations expressed concern about the continuing repressive and militarized approach to public security.
According to official figures, more than 2,000 people were detained in quarantine centres for alleged violations of the mandatory national quarantine imposed in late March, some for up to 40 days. Conditions in these centres fell short of minimum standards for sanitary conditions and physical distancing, putting those held at unnecessary risk of COVID-19 infection.3
Between 13 March and 27 May, the Supreme Court received 330 habeas corpus petitions and 61 amparos (requests for judicial protection) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In many of these cases, people alleged that conditions in the quarantine centres were inadequate, lacked cleaning materials and drinkable water, and that people were unable to access medication for chronic illnesses. El Salvador’s Ombudsperson Office (PDDH) identified at least 44 cases of people deprived of their liberty in the context of the quarantine between March and May who had underlying medical conditions.
In April, a human rights defender who has diabetes was detained when she went out to buy food and medicine for her three-year-old child. She spent more than a month in a quarantine centre with poor conditions, which could have increased her exposure to COVID-19.
That same month, while cases of health workers infected with COVID-19 and a lack of adequate equipment were being reported, the President vetoed Decree 620. The Decree, which aimed to guarantee health insurance and biosafety equipment to health workers, was later declared constitutional by the Constitutional Chamber.
As of late July, at least 104 health workers had died from COVID-19.4
Hundreds of people detained for alleged quarantine violations were taken to government quarantine centres or police stations, as if they had committed a crime. In that context, the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court ruled that the authorities had no legal basis for holding people in these centres as a form of punishment. Some detainees stated in their appeals before the Chamber that they were detained solely for leaving their houses to buy food or medicine.
The PDDH received hundreds of complaints of human rights violations by the security forces, including reports of excessive use of force and ill-treatment, in the context of enforcing the quarantine.
In March, a 17-year-old boy reported that the police detained him as he was leaving work on a sugar plantation. He and his family stated that the police beat him and took him to a detention centre, where he was held with adults for almost three days before being released without charge.
In another case, a young man reported that when he went out to buy food and fuel after being paid, a police officer detained him, beat him and shot him twice in the legs.5
Throughout the year, the President issued public statements vilifying civil society groups, including journalists and human rights organizations, and stigmatizing those seeking greater government transparency and accountability.
In June, human rights organizations reported that, following the introduction of the measures to tackle COVID-19, attacks on local organizations and women human rights defenders increased significantly, particularly through digital media. Organizations also reported an increase in government statements that put human rights defenders at risk.6
The Legislative Assembly failed to approve the Law for the Recognition and Comprehensive Protection of Human Rights Defenders and for the Guarantee of the Right to Defend Human Rights; the bill had been presented before the Assembly in 2018.
In February, the Legislative Assembly approved a decree containing the Special Law on Transitional Justice, Reparation and Reconciliation. This contains provisions that hinder the investigation and effective punishment of those responsible for crimes under international law. The President vetoed the decree later that month.7 However, the government failed to make public information related to military operations during the internal armed conflict (1980-1992) and denied judicial access to military operation files related to the 1981 El Mozote massacre.
In September, a Spanish court convicted a former Salvadoran colonel and former defence minister for the murder of five Jesuit priests in 1989, during the armed conflict.8
The total ban on abortion remained in place and until June at least 18 women remained in jail on charges related to obstetric emergencies.